CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs SAGWX

47% FI Score
  • sagwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Company Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SCPYX

47% FI Score
  • scpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SCWCX

47% FI Score
  • scwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SFIG

47% FI Score
  • sfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SGG

47% FI Score
  • sgg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SLASX

47% FI Score
  • slasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Selected American Shares Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs STIRX

47% FI Score
  • stirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs STWVX

47% FI Score
  • stwvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SVBAX

47% FI Score
  • svbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TCPYX

47% FI Score
  • tcpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PXQSX

47% FI Score
  • pxqsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CAMWX

47% FI Score
  • camwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cambiar Opportunity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CAPAX

47% FI Score
  • capax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Capital Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs XSW

47% FI Score
  • xsw
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MGNDX

47% FI Score
  • mgndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Praxis Growth Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MHCAX

47% FI Score
  • mhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CBPSX

47% FI Score
  • cbpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CHAD

47% FI Score
  • chad
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bear 1X Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MIMYX

47% FI Score
  • mimyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo