CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MITCX

48% FI Score
  • mitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HMJIX

48% FI Score
  • hmjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TMAFX

47% FI Score
  • tmafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs USO

47% FI Score
  • uso
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Oil Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs UXABX

47% FI Score
  • uxabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA California Bond Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VKMGX

47% FI Score
  • vkmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Quality Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WFIG

47% FI Score
  • wfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WMFCX

47% FI Score
  • wmfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WOFDX

47% FI Score
  • wofdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Opportunity Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BWLAX

47% FI Score
  • bwlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Value Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CCVAX

47% FI Score
  • ccvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Calvert Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JCUIX

47% FI Score
  • jcuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

John Hancock Funds Absolute Return Currency Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs UMNIX

47% FI Score
  • umnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo