CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs MCDVX

49% FI Score
  • mcdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs DFP

49% FI Score
  • dfp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PYEMX

49% FI Score
  • pyemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CUSOX

49% FI Score
  • cusox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MSLVX

49% FI Score
  • mslvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs DMBAX

49% FI Score
  • dmbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CVSCX

49% FI Score
  • cvscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OPSIX

49% FI Score
  • opsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PEQIX

49% FI Score
  • peqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Pioneer Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RWLS

49% FI Score
  • rwls
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Direxion Russell Large Over Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SBALX

49% FI Score
  • sbalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory Strategic Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EQL

49% FI Score
  • eql
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PHDAX

49% FI Score
  • phdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ETV

49% FI Score
  • etv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EVLMC

49% FI Score
  • evlmc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond NextShares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FAFJX

49% FI Score
  • fafjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FAJEX

49% FI Score
  • fajex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Frost Total Return Bond Fund A Class Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GSSMX

49% FI Score
  • gssmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GTRAX

49% FI Score
  • gtrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GWMEX

49% FI Score
  • gwmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo