BUL : Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

BUL is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with LOW fees.

BUL

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

FI Score

41 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BUL vs IBDD

56% FI Score
  • ibdd
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares iBonds Mar 2023 Term Corporate ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MNCPX

56% FI Score
  • mncpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series Class I

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs PNQI

56% FI Score
  • pnqi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MPLDX

56% FI Score
  • mpldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Short Duration Income Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs IGV

56% FI Score
  • igv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs PSSAX

56% FI Score
  • pssax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MRSAX

56% FI Score
  • mrsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MDLOX

56% FI Score
  • mdlox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc. Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs FILL

56% FI Score
  • fill
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MPBAX

56% FI Score
  • mpbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MTOAX

56% FI Score
  • mtoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2025 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs FPEI

56% FI Score
  • fpei
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs JLJAX

56% FI Score
  • jljax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs TOLZ

56% FI Score
  • tolz
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs SMTHX

56% FI Score
  • smthx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs OPPAX

56% FI Score
  • oppax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs IBMO

56% FI Score
  • ibmo
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs HEQ

56% FI Score
  • heq
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

John Hancock Hedged Equity & Income Fund

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs ITB

56% FI Score
  • itb
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs TBF

56% FI Score
  • tbf
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo