Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$BRLAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- abwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aggcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ediax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgirx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »