Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$BRLAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ugeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mcgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- teqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbc
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lsggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gxscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dvfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »