Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$BNGLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tedsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eto
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lgmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- temex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- etg
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- msopx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jta
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »