Diversification Rating
10 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$BNDX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond International funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- brugx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bvsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Baywood Socially Responsible Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bgvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dfdsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Strategic Allocation Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ltmdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- eagcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hnddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Horizon Active Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »