Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$BACPX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vtv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vo
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sptm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
Expenses: 0.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vcitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Vanguard California Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vglt
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- schv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tlt
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- visgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Vanguard Small Capitalization Growth Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vnytx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Vanguard New York Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »