Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AQIIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- atccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB Tax-Aware Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- azscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
American Beacon Zebra Small Cap Equity Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ltl
- ETF
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- bcrex
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- pfkax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Pacific Funds Small-Cap Class A
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bmhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cfrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pglbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class B
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cgbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
City National Rochdale Government Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- dacfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- supcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dgsmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
DGHM V2000 SmallCap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhtrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Centre Active U.S. Treasury Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecolx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Riverbridge Eco Leaders® Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- etabx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- etcdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- etcmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »