Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AMECX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- htayx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ssiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wflex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Westwood Flexible Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- calcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wmbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- agiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cmalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »