Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AFLCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jedcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrwx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- imycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agepx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Beacon Frontier Markets Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eadox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ddfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfrbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plahx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »