Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$ACWI Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fppax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ehgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ewecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- apgrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cvlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bgiix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth C Class
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »