AATSX : Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class S

AATSX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with MODERATE fees.

AATSX

Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class S

FI Score

35 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AATSX vs GCINX

25% FI Score
  • gcinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund Individual Investor

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs GIGAX

25% FI Score
  • gigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs SSEMX

25% FI Score
  • ssemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

State Street Defensive Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs PCWAX

25% FI Score
  • pcwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs PDHVX

25% FI Score
  • pdhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs PFRBX

25% FI Score
  • pfrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs NAICX

25% FI Score
  • naicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AIG Strategic Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs TFSAX

25% FI Score
  • tfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs NCECX

25% FI Score
  • ncecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs GRES

25% FI Score
  • gres
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

IQ Global Resources ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs NFTY

25% FI Score
  • nfty
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs NWHKX

25% FI Score
  • nwhkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs PAJZX

25% FI Score
  • pajzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs MBNBX

25% FI Score
  • mbnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs PGTDX

25% FI Score
  • pgtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AATSX vs MGBDX

25% FI Score
  • mgbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo