All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- mvgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Metropolitan West AlphaTrak 500 Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mwfsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Metropolitan West Flexible Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nawcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- niltx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class Trust
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- nlr
- ETF
- Allocation
- Other
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
- nmaex
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
Nuveen Equity Market Neutral Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- nwhjx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- olccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »