All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- rpgex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- svoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- uitbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
USAA Intermediate-Term Bond Fund Adviser Shares
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- olvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbffx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Capital World Bond Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dagvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vmmsx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- hscyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
The Hartford Small Company Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mjfox
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Japan Stock
Matthews Japan Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »