All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- ewmc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ewk
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Other Region
iShares MSCI Belgium Capped ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
- ewje
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Japan Stock
iShares MSCI Japan Equal Weighted ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- ewgs
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Other Region
iShares MSCI Germany Small-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
- ewenx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eweix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ewecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eweax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ewco
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Communication Services
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »