All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- occix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Conservative Investor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lpeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wtsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Dividend Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- blypx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ftiex
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® Total International Equity Fund
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- lprax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- calcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »