All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- pdlex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Prudential Day One 2060 Fund Class R2
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pdn
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- pdncx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Principal Diversified International Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- pdnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Diversified Income Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pdrex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pdrfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pdsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdscx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdszx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdvax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pdvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Diversified Income Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdvmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Diversified Income Trust Class M
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- peafx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- pebcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pebnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pecax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
JPMorgan Intrepid Mid Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pedgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Principal Edge MidCap Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- peeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- peebx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »