XOP : SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

XOP is a Sector Equity Market Energy with LOW fees.

XOP

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

FI Score

74 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Energy funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XOP vs MIISX

39% FI Score
  • miisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BNY Mellon Income Stock Fund Investor shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs MSIAX

39% FI Score
  • msiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs SXPCX

39% FI Score
  • sxpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS S&P 500 Index Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs EMGCX

39% FI Score
  • emgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs IOFCX

39% FI Score
  • iofcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs RYIPX

39% FI Score
  • ryipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs MECGX

39% FI Score
  • mecgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Great Consumer Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs ASIAX

39% FI Score
  • asiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs DMBZX

39% FI Score
  • dmbzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs FEAFX

39% FI Score
  • feafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

First Eagle Fund of America Class Y

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs MAPIX

39% FI Score
  • mapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs SWMIX

39% FI Score
  • swmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs RSPYX

39% FI Score
  • rspyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory RS Partners Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs PTWAX

39% FI Score
  • ptwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs QEENX

39% FI Score
  • qeenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XOP vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo