XMLV : Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF

XMLV is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with LOW fees.

XMLV

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XMLV vs LPHAX

16% FI Score
  • lphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs CHYDX

16% FI Score
  • chydx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs NRCFX

16% FI Score
  • nrcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs MOGLX

16% FI Score
  • moglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Gabelli Media Mogul Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs CGMCX

16% FI Score
  • cgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FLOTX

16% FI Score
  • flotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs BRKCX

16% FI Score
  • brkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs ECTTX

16% FI Score
  • ecttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs DURCX

16% FI Score
  • durcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DDWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs IPBCX

16% FI Score
  • ipbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs RJN

16% FI Score
  • rjn
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Energy Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs LEDIX

16% FI Score
  • ledix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs LFIFX

16% FI Score
  • lfifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Leader High Quality Low Duration Bond Fund InstitutionalShares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs PFJDX

16% FI Score
  • pfjdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs IDVIX

16% FI Score
  • idvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs GAMDX

16% FI Score
  • gamdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo