XDIV : Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

XDIV is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

XDIV

Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XDIV vs DOMIX

41% FI Score
  • domix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Domini Impact International Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs AGRAX

41% FI Score
  • agrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs RGOIX

41% FI Score
  • rgoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RBC Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MBAIX

41% FI Score
  • mbaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs CSCIX

41% FI Score
  • cscix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs HYHG

41% FI Score
  • hyhg
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FCA

41% FI Score
  • fca
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs DEMCX

41% FI Score
  • demcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Delaware Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs RSFYX

41% FI Score
  • rsfyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Victory Floating Rate Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs BLDCX

41% FI Score
  • bldcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs AEMGX

41% FI Score
  • aemgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs IAK

41% FI Score
  • iak
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

iShares U.S. Insurance ETF

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs INIYX

41% FI Score
  • iniyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ACCIX

41% FI Score
  • accix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs JFEAX

41% FI Score
  • jfeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

JPMorgan International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ABWAX

41% FI Score
  • abwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB All Market Total Return Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs IBBFX

41% FI Score
  • ibbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ABRCX

41% FI Score
  • abrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs JDVAX

41% FI Score
  • jdvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Diversified Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs PTRMX

41% FI Score
  • ptrmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Performance Trust Municipal Bond Fund - A Class

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo