WIL : Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

WIL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

WIL

Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Similar Funds

We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WIL vs AEYCX

43% FI Score
  • aeycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

American Century Equity Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EIVDX

43% FI Score
  • eivdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Classic Value Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GTCEX

42% FI Score
  • gtcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs JLCAX

42% FI Score
  • jlcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs OMSOX

42% FI Score
  • omsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street All Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs ARSQX

42% FI Score
  • arsqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs OCRDX

42% FI Score
  • ocrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs ACSI

42% FI Score
  • acsi
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GSPQX

42% FI Score
  • gspqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs TLCYX

42% FI Score
  • tlcyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs SPICX

42% FI Score
  • spicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs SILVX

42% FI Score
  • silvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SGI U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PMYCX

42% FI Score
  • pmycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs VARIX

42% FI Score
  • varix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PMYBX

42% FI Score
  • pmybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs KNGYX

41% FI Score
  • kngyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs CMNCX

41% FI Score
  • cmncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Principal Capital Appreciation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs XLSR

41% FI Score
  • xlsr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SPDR SSGA U.S. Sector Rotation ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs TVIFX

41% FI Score
  • tvifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EVTMX

41% FI Score
  • evtmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Dividend Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo