WIL : Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

WIL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

WIL

Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WIL vs ECDIX

33% FI Score
  • ecdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs ECOW

33% FI Score
  • ecow
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EKWAX

33% FI Score
  • ekwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs WGGNX

33% FI Score
  • wggnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EPV

33% FI Score
  • epv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EQIAX

33% FI Score
  • eqiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs BLCN

33% FI Score
  • blcn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Reality Shares Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EVGBC

33% FI Score
  • evgbc
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FBDIX

33% FI Score
  • fbdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FIGIX

33% FI Score
  • figix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 2-5 Year Service Shares

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FITSX

33% FI Score
  • fitsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Government Income Trust Service Shares

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FLM

33% FI Score
  • flm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FMIEX

33% FI Score
  • fmiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wasatch Global Value Fund™ Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FOCIX

33% FI Score
  • focix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fairholme Focused Income Fund

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FPBFX

33% FI Score
  • fpbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Fidelity® Pacific Basin Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FRSAX

33% FI Score
  • frsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GAZ

33% FI Score
  • gaz
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex Total ReturnSM ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GIFPX

33% FI Score
  • gifpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GPIOX

33% FI Score
  • gpiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Grandeur Peak International Opportunities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GPROX

33% FI Score
  • gprox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo