Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Federated Ultrashort Bond Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
BrandywineGLOBAL - International Opportunities Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Madison Tax-Free National Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Rational Strategic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
AMG GW&K Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Madison Core Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map