Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$WFSHX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aybax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jassx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class S
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgglx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mggbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AMG Managers Global Income Opportunity Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »