Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$WFGGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- msptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Advantage Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seqpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kgdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Small Cap Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- vbfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Victory Strategic Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfsmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bbgnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BBH Global Core Select Fund Class N Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tlvox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Thrivent Low Volatility Equity Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »