Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VWNFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mndfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series Class I
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhlax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdvkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Fidelity® Value Discovery K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jvlax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- amadx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Income and Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sinax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lvaex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
LSV Value Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wlcix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbcvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Fidelity® Blue Chip Value Fund
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »