• jdeax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sphq
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• snaex
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Schroder North American Equity Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fdlo
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sapyx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

ClearBridge Appreciation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• moat
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fdetx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Fidelity Advisor® Capital Development Fund Class O

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ntsx
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

WisdomTree 90/60 U.S. Balanced Fund

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• gsew
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• flcex
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Fidelity® Large Cap Core Enhanced Index Fund

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »