VIMSX : Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor Shares

VIMSX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend index fund with LOW fees.

VIMSX

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor Shares

FI Score

87 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare VIMSX vs JAQIX

29% FI Score
  • jaqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Janus Henderson Asia Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs JIFIX

29% FI Score
  • jifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Janus Henderson International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs KBWD

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs KCIIX

29% FI Score
  • kciix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Knights of Columbus International Equity Fund I Share

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs LGH

29% FI Score
  • lgh
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs PRICX

29% FI Score
  • pricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs PRVBX

29% FI Score
  • prvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs RYCBX

29% FI Score
  • rycbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs RYTNX

29% FI Score
  • rytnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs RYTTX

29% FI Score
  • ryttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs SBFAX

29% FI Score
  • sbfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

1919 Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs SCCPX

29% FI Score
  • sccpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs SCSSX

29% FI Score
  • scssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs SDCI

29% FI Score
  • sdci
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs BGLAX

29% FI Score
  • bglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs FSBCX

29% FI Score
  • fsbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs BAQAX

29% FI Score
  • baqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare VIMSX vs FUD

29% FI Score
  • fud
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Food Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo