Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VIMAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rymex
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
Rydex Commodities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- embcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sppix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProFunds Short Precious Metals Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rywjx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Weakening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- pcycx
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- afbix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Access Flex Bear High Yield Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- asffx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Arrow Dynamic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ascendant Tactical Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »