Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VHYAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ousa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jval
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- svoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jcvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Classic Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dura
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eplcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Focused Dividend Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- svaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qlc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »