Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VFSTX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- prwbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fshbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Short-Term Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fihbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Institutional High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hllvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibdq
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vtc
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pifzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cmgax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio Investor A1 Shares
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ppvax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »