Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$VEVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 178 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nmavx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rwk
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tsvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tcvyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hmvtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- abmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
AMG Managers Fairpointe Mid Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pmdax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mvccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- py
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Principal Shareholder Yield Index ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »