Diversification Rating
9 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$VDC Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- coglx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Cognios Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpqax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Counterpoint Long-Short Equity Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- neagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryilx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- dwafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ryazx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryrrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- epibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nginx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »