Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$USL Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Focused funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bnmsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock National Municipal Fund Service Share
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pxh
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- claix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- prwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ptcax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pcy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cwgfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rpv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dtd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »