Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$UMBMX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hmkix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Hartford Municipal Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds The Income Fund of America® Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dbulx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- caf
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- China Stock
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- eems
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- hdvsx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford International Equity Fund Class R4
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jnbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cwgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jtbdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »