UCIB
UBS ETRACS UBS Bloomberg Constant Maturity Commodity Index (CMCI) Total Return ETN Series B
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$UCIB Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fiigx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Investment Grade Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msllx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- usbnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund Ordinary Class
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fcfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Frost Credit Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- igjax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Ivy Government Securities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bdcz
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
UBS ETRACS Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- vicex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rdlcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- peicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Value Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vicax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bdafx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vvocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pslbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Putnam Small Cap Value Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mnhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series Class S
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emgrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- csmdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iaopx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- miocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MFS Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »