• ppnax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Putnam AMT-Free Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• prphx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• prrfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• revcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Columbia Global Equity Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• rji
• ETF
• Commodities
• Broad

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

• rusl
• ETF
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Russia Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• sctcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo California Tax-Free Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• sef
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares Short Financials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• shscx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• stpp
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

iPath US Treasury Steepener ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• svxy
• ETF
• Alternative
• Volatility

ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

• tblu
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• tghyx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

TCW High Yield Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tgmbx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tnyix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Thornburg New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• wflox
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target Today Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• wfqax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2050 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• wfqbx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2035 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• jertx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Real Estate

Janus Henderson Global Real Estate Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

• jeibx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »