Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Dynamic Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map