TQSMX : T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund

TQSMX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with MODERATE fees.

TQSMX

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund

FI Score

39 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TQSMX vs AYBAX

19% FI Score
  • aybax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs VNDFX

19% FI Score
  • vndfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs ICTUX

19% FI Score
  • ictux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs NFRCX

19% FI Score
  • nfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs GSCKX

19% FI Score
  • gsckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs EFU

19% FI Score
  • efu
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs ARYMX

19% FI Score
  • arymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

American Century Global Real Estate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs FLFGX

19% FI Score
  • flfgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Meeder Global Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs HAICX

19% FI Score
  • haicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford AARP Balanced Retirement Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs FUSCX

19% FI Score
  • fuscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class C shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs JAHSX

19% FI Score
  • jahsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

James Alpha EHS Portfolio Class S

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs PGGLX

18% FI Score
  • pgglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Global Income Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs ECDCX

18% FI Score
  • ecdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs PGLBX

18% FI Score
  • pglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Global Income Trust Class B

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs RDMAX

18% FI Score
  • rdmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs EZNYX

18% FI Score
  • eznyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs PUFBX

18% FI Score
  • pufbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs HNRZX

18% FI Score
  • hnrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs ARCHX

18% FI Score
  • archx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Archer Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TQSMX vs NSOPX

18% FI Score
  • nsopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Star Opportunity Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo