Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$TOK Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ediax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aggcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ahtpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glosx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tesgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kgdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Small Cap Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- abwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tvfvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Third Avenue Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »