Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$TGIAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- calcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- weacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gdma
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF New
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cbprx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wflex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Westwood Flexible Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jpvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- caacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- agiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »