Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$TASHX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dfbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Strategic Allocation Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cacmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mblax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Madison Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wflex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Westwood Flexible Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cbprx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jpvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gdma
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF New
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- htayx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »