TAPR : Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

TAPR is a Alternative Market Inverse with LOW fees.

TAPR

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAPR vs DSDAX

39% FI Score
  • dsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Tax Sensitive Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs DMBZX

39% FI Score
  • dmbzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PPVCX

39% FI Score
  • ppvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs MAPIX

39% FI Score
  • mapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs SWMIX

39% FI Score
  • swmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PTWAX

39% FI Score
  • ptwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs VVPSX

39% FI Score
  • vvpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs QEENX

39% FI Score
  • qeenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs FMTAX

39% FI Score
  • fmtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PAIIX

39% FI Score
  • paiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PADAX

39% FI Score
  • padax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs KAUBX

39% FI Score
  • kaubx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs KAUCX

39% FI Score
  • kaucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs BAPLX

39% FI Score
  • baplx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta 2055 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo