TAPR : Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

TAPR is a Alternative Market Inverse with LOW fees.

TAPR

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAPR vs FSEAX

49% FI Score
  • fseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Fidelity® Emerging Asia Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs MTKIX

49% FI Score
  • mtkix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs OARDX

49% FI Score
  • oardx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs CIPMX

49% FI Score
  • cipmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Champlain Mid Cap Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs LBWIX

49% FI Score
  • lbwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs GHYG

49% FI Score
  • ghyg
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs NMANX

49% FI Score
  • nmanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs IXG

49% FI Score
  • ixg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

iShares Global Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs LCEVX

49% FI Score
  • lcevx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs CHTRX

49% FI Score
  • chtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Charter Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs EDEN

49% FI Score
  • eden
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Denmark ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs SCGVX

49% FI Score
  • scgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs PEAFX

49% FI Score
  • peafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs VRAI

49% FI Score
  • vrai
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Virtus Real Asset Income ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs FTRAX

49% FI Score
  • ftrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ Retirement Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs RTM

49% FI Score
  • rtm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAPR vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo