TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs ASDAX

16% FI Score
  • asdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYBHX

16% FI Score
  • rybhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYMGX

16% FI Score
  • rymgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs EAIIX

16% FI Score
  • eaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GWSAX

16% FI Score
  • gwsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs BRKCX

16% FI Score
  • brkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs IPBCX

16% FI Score
  • ipbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GBTFX

16% FI Score
  • gbtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

U.S. Global Investors All American Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs MRAEX

16% FI Score
  • mraex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® A Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs ANCIX

16% FI Score
  • ancix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora MicroCap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SUHCX

16% FI Score
  • suhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo