TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs RYBOX

18% FI Score
  • rybox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs UIPIX

18% FI Score
  • uipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CARZ

18% FI Score
  • carz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SOPIX

18% FI Score
  • sopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs THYCX

18% FI Score
  • thycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SEUPX

18% FI Score
  • seupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYPMX

18% FI Score
  • rypmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs THBVX

18% FI Score
  • thbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PROCX

18% FI Score
  • procx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs VFPAX

18% FI Score
  • vfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Private Capital Management Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs ULE

18% FI Score
  • ule
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Ultra Euro

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYRLX

18% FI Score
  • ryrlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYVNX

18% FI Score
  • ryvnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs USPVX

18% FI Score
  • uspvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Union Street Partners Value Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WHYCX

18% FI Score
  • whycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SIEAX

18% FI Score
  • sieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RSGFX

18% FI Score
  • rsgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo