TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs HJPSX

30% FI Score
  • hjpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs VNSAX

30% FI Score
  • vnsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs HISIX

30% FI Score
  • hisix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Homestead International Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RSSYX

30% FI Score
  • rssyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Select Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs XSLCX

29% FI Score
  • xslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WEHIX

29% FI Score
  • wehix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Weitz Funds Hickory Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYTTX

29% FI Score
  • ryttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYCBX

29% FI Score
  • rycbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYTNX

29% FI Score
  • rytnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GUTEX

29% FI Score
  • gutex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Victory Tax-Exempt Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GCVCX

29% FI Score
  • gcvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SEVPX

29% FI Score
  • sevpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs ABQCX

29% FI Score
  • abqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AB Total Return Bond Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WBIL

29% FI Score
  • wbil
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PJIAX

29% FI Score
  • pjiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs HMJCX

29% FI Score
  • hmjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs THHYX

29% FI Score
  • thhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Toews Tactical Income Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs HDPSX

29% FI Score
  • hdpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Hodges Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs IDMIX

29% FI Score
  • idmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo