TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs MBCAX

32% FI Score
  • mbcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NSCIX

32% FI Score
  • nscix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia South Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WIBAX

32% FI Score
  • wibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wilmington Intermediate-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RULFX

32% FI Score
  • rulfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NMUCX

32% FI Score
  • nmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs MCLVX

32% FI Score
  • mclvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NINCX

32% FI Score
  • nincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RWCIX

32% FI Score
  • rwcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RWC Global Emerging Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NHICX

32% FI Score
  • nhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RSNYX

32% FI Score
  • rsnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RSPFX

32% FI Score
  • rspfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory RS Partners Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TSDOX

32% FI Score
  • tsdox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Touchstone Ultra Short Duration Fixed Income Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PLBCX

32% FI Score
  • plbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TSDAX

32% FI Score
  • tsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Touchstone Ultra Short Duration Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CFLGX

32% FI Score
  • cflgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NFACX

32% FI Score
  • nfacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RSMOX

32% FI Score
  • rsmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GPEOX

32% FI Score
  • gpeox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Grandeur Peak Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs GIDAX

32% FI Score
  • gidax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs IEFCX

32% FI Score
  • iefcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco Energy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo